Skip to content

⚠︎ Risk warning: leveraged derivatives on unregulated platforms — you can lose everything you deposit. Not investment advice.

Comparison · By · Updated 2026-09-09

Lighter vs Pacifica (2026): Zero Fees vs Solana Tiers

Both venues are newer order books with weekly points programmes and no fiat on-ramp. Lighter settles to Ethereum through a zk-rollup and charges Standard accounts nothing. Pacifica matches off-chain and settles on Solana, with maker and taker rates that fall with volume, hourly funding capped at 4%, and a published 3–50x leverage range. Lighter has a live token; Pacifica's docs confirm none.

Verdict

Lighter on cost and token; Pacifica on a documented, organic-only points pool. Pacifica's entry-tier rates are competitive and improve with volume, but they start above Lighter's zero and never reach it on the taker side. Pacifica's points programme is the clearer of the two on paper, with a fixed weekly pool and self-trading excluded, while Lighter's status is unverified in its own docs. Neither documents what points become.

At a glance

Lighter versus Pacifica, compared across key dimensions
Lighter Pacifica
Architecture zk-rollup on Ethereum Solana; off-chain matching
Custody Non-custodial (rollup) On-chain; hot wallet + multisig cold vault
KYC Not stated No KYC step in docs; Terms bar US, UK, Canada +9
Base perp fees 0% (Standard) / 0.0280% (Premium) / 0% (Standard) / 0.0040% (Premium) t/m WINNER 0.040% → 0.028% (by tier) / 0.015% → 0% (by tier) t/m
Funding 1h period · P2P Hourly (5s) · ±4% cap
Token LIT · live WINNER None documented
Points programme Unverified · Points Season 2 Active · Points program

facts verified · each venue's official docs Every cell restates a claim on one of this site's pages: /compare/hyperliquid-vs-lighter/ , /lighter/fees/ , /pacifica/ , /pacifica/how-to-start/ , /pacifica/fees/ , /airdrops/ .

Fees

Lighter — Order-book; zero-fee Standard accounts, paid Premium tier for higher limits. Base tier: 0% (Standard) / 0.0280% (Premium) taker, 0% (Standard) / 0.0040% (Premium) maker. Numerics reflect Standard accounts (zero-fee); Premium trades 0.0040%/0.0280% with a LIT-staking discount grid. Discounts: LIT staking reduces Premium rates on a published grid. Standard’s trade-off is latency (300ms taker) and API rate limits, not hidden fees or position caps; LIT is live (staking discounts the Premium grid) and the points program remains a separate, conversion-undocumented track. Schedule verified 2026-07-31 on /lighter/fees/.

Pacifica — Order-book maker/taker; volume tiers. Base tier: 0.040% → 0.028% (by tier) taker, 0.015% → 0% (by tier) maker. Numerics are the entry tier; both rates improve with volume. Discounts: Eight 30-day-volume tiers take taker to 0.028% and maker to 0% (VIP 1 from $100M); a verified tier from another exchange can be carried over for 30 days; no token discount. Schedule verified 2026-09-11 on /pacifica/fees/.

Base-tier rates answer one narrow question — what a small taker order costs on day one. Your maker/taker mix, volume tier and holding period decide the real number; the fee comparison lays all twelve venues side by side and the execution-cost tool adds live slippage on top.

Markets they share

In this site's market join, snapshot 2026-09-02, Lighter lists 214 perp markets and Pacifica lists 75; 65 appear on both. The market index shows every asset with the venues that list it and each venue's published leverage, and the join is refreshed weekly by a fail-closed pipeline. Breadth is not depth: a listing says nothing about how much size a book absorbs, which the execution-cost tool measures live where a venue publishes its order book.

Token and points

Both rows are restated from the points & airdrop tracker, which is re-read against each venue's docs on a 45-day cadence and never prices a point.

Where Lighter wins

Cost and the token. 0% both sides on Standard accounts against Pacifica's tiered taker rate; a published Premium grid for those who outgrow Standard; LIT live and bought back from fee revenue where Pacifica has no confirmed token. Ethereum settlement through validity proofs rather than an off-chain matcher.

Where Pacifica wins

Points clarity and published risk controls. Its docs state a weekly pool, a snapshot time, and that self-trading and sybil activity earn nothing; Lighter's retail page states a pool but its market-makers page says the season ended. Pacifica also publishes its funding cap and its leverage range, both verified on this site's Hyperliquid vs Pacifica page.

What this site could not verify

Which to pick

For cost or a live token, Lighter. For Solana-native trading with a points programme whose rules are unambiguous, Pacifica, with the caveat that no token is confirmed and the docs make no conversion statement. On leverage, Pacifica publishes its range and Lighter's was not verified here, so check the market page before sizing. The Lighter review holds the detail on the Lighter side.

Related comparisons

FAQ

Does Pacifica have a token?

Not one confirmed live in its docs on the verification date, and no launch or conversion statement was found. Its points are earned by organic trading only.

Which has lower fees?

Lighter's Standard tier at 0% both sides. Pacifica's maker rate reaches 0% at the top of its volume ladder; its taker rate does not.

Is Lighter's points programme still running?

Its retail page describes weekly distribution with no end date, but its market-makers page says Season 2 ended in December 2025. This site lists it as unverified until the docs agree.

Open Lighter → (opens in a new tab)

affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you · methodology